Author Archive for R. Oliphant – Page 119

GOVERNING BOARD CHAIR SIGAFOOS REFUSES MCCASLAND’S REQUEST TO BE APPOINTED CO-LIAISON FOR BOARD TO FOUNDATION; ANOTHER EAST-COUNTY INSULT

To some, it appears Sigafoos is attempting to totally marginalize McCasland as a Board member; his effort also appears to have as its goal maintaining iron-fisted control of all Community College matters in the hands of the west-county voting bloc no matter how small

Recall that at the January session of the Community College Governing Board, the west-county representatives voted as a bloc to reject Deb McCasland as the Board secretary for the coming year.  Instead, they placed both the Chair and the Board secretary’s position in the hands of west-county representatives. McCasland had more experience and seniority as a Board member that Steve Irwin; however, she was rejected.

At the February meeting, representative Paul Chevalier wrote to the Board members of his concern over the fact the east-county had been shut out of any Board leadership positions for over a decade.  It is seems pretty clear after the February meeting that the west-county representatives cared little about his observation.

Also, at the February meeting, representative Deb McCasland made a request that she be appointed co-liaison for the Board to the College Community College Foundation. The Board liaison serves as the point of contact for information review, input, and approval prior to Board receipt. Board liaisons attend and participate in all meetings and conference calls of their assigned committees.

 Chair Sigafoos, who holds the sole power of appointment, said it was not possible to appoint McCasland.  Rather than appoint McCasland, who has a long history of working with the Foundation before retiring, he said he had two requests that the two members from the west side of the County remain.  (The Blog assumes the request came from west County representatives McCarver and Irwin who now are the two Board liaisons and sat with their mouths tight-lipped during this part of the meeting.) 

Rather than appoint McCasland because of her experience and seniority as a Board member, and relieve one of the existing members of the position, Sigafoos lamely explained that if he appointed McCasland he would have a quorum at the Foundation’s monthly meetings.  And he couldn’t do that. 

Sigafoos appeared to be heading toward appointing Paul Chevalier and relieving  McCasland of her current liaison position to the Arizona Association of Community College Trustees (AACCT). The AACCT, it should be noted, meets at most once or twice a year and is as lightweight of an appointment that you can get. When Chevalier refused the appointment, Sigafoos back-tracked and appointed McCasland.

It is suspected that Sigafoos wanted to leave McCasland with no liaison position at all so as to further marginalize her as a Governing Board member.

For those unaware, the Foundation meetings are viewed as major monthly social gatherings on the west side of the County with community leaders attending who reside primarily in Prescott and Prescott Valley.  It is often during these meetings and under the influence of these powerful west side civic leaders that the future course of Yavapai College is charted.  Persons like Board member Steve Irwin see the monthly meetings as a rare opportunity to develop contacts with community leaders that can no doubt help  his real estate business.

Because of the ruling by Sigafoos, McCasland is essentially barred from attending any Foundation meetings. 

Just another insult to the residents of the east side of Yavapai County.

You may view the discussion and ruling by Sigafoos on the video clip below.

 

GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER CHEVALIER SPANKS WEST-COUNTY MEMBERS’ REFUSAL TO SHARE GOVERNANCE WITH EAST-COUNTY

Says East-County has been deprived of any board leadership position for at least 12 years; laments treatment of McCasland

Third District Yavapai Community College Governing Board representative Paul Chevalier expressed his concern about the failure of the West-County Board members to seek a consensus with East-County members on important issues at the February Board meeting. Or, sharing leadership positions of any kind with members representing the east side of the County for at least the last twelve years.

After evaluating his first session with the full Board, he made the following written comments that are  included as a part of the February Board agenda.

“I have observed the Board since 2014. I have not seen the Board being engaged in any strategic thinking OR in-depth future planning at Board meetings.

“With regard to collective decision making, the west side Board leadership makes little or no effort to get consensus with the east side representatives (at least since 2014 to present).

“Board Leadership: There has not been a Chair or Secretary of the YCGB coming from the east side in 12 years. The Board majority (the three west side representatives) does not share Board leadership with the east side representatives, unlike our County Board of Supervisors that rotate the chair and secretary positions every year. The east side representatives have been shut out for twelve years!

“Last month I nominated Deb McCasland (who represents part of Verde Valley and is in her 5th year on the Board)) for secretary and all three westside representatives declined to vote for her. We continue with a chair and a secretary from the west side. The west side representatives unwillingness to share Board leadership with east side representatives contributes to making us a divided Board.

“I hope for change.”

Kudos to Mr. Chevalier!

GOVERNING BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVES NEW SCHOLARSHIP PLAN FOR THOSE TAKING ACCREDITED CLASSES

25% Discount for seniors, 20% discount for full-time students taking 15 credits; those County grads going full-time and completing promise program may have entire tuition returned

The Yavapai Community College District Governing Board unanimously approved three scholarship proposals at its Tuesday, February 12 meeting.  The new scholarships will become available for the fall 2019 semester.

The new scholarships, according to the College, include:

  • A 25% discount for senior citizens who are taking credit classes
  • A 20% discount for any full-time student taking 15 credits per term. The courses must be completed on time. Currently, only 9% of the student body takes 15 credits or more.
  • The launch of the Community College Promise Program that would allow for current high school and GED graduates from Yavapai County to have their tuition reimbursed upon completion of their desired degree. Among the requirements, students in this program must complete their degree in seven consecutive semesters with maximum reimbursement of 60 credits.

The scholarships are not available to part-time students (except for seniors) taking credit courses. According to the College data, part-time students made up 77% of the student body in 2018-19. The scholarships are also only available to County residents.

Dr. Lisa Rhine, when reflecting on the scholarships, said that “With the rising cost of postsecondary education across the country, it has become tougher for people to be able to attend college and receive the education that they deserve.  These new scholarships will bring higher education within the reach of many more Yavapai County Residents while incentivizing timely degree completion.”

Dr. Clint Ewell, Vice President of Finance and Administrative Services, commented that “the Senior Citizen discounts are a great way for us to say thank you for supporting the College.”

COLLEGE ANNOUNCES IT ANTICIPATES CONSTRUCTION OF SOME SORT IN BUILDING L TO START BY MAY 15, 2019

Design team, architects and construction companies all selected; secret meetings regarding Building L held in January with locally selected Verde Valley politicians and others

As noted in earlier blog notes, Building L on the Verde Campus has been renovated, remodeled, and otherwise revamped for a variety of purposes since 2004.  It is the Rodney Dangerfield of College buildings. Here we go again.

The Yavapai Community College Facilities Management department announced at the February 2019 Board meeting that programming is underway regarding Building L on the Verde Campus. Faculty and staff review meetings were scheduled throughout January 2019, according to the College.

It also announced that it had selected a Design Team (SPS+ Architects Construction Team) and a construction team ( Kinney Construction Services).

During January the College held secret meetings with a hand-picked number of politicians and others in the Verde Valley where the future of Building L was discussed.  Because there is no record available of that meeting and the press was not allowed to attend, it is not clear what was said and by whom.

The College must use Building L for some type of Career and Technical Education because it was constructed in part back in 2004 with the help of a Government grant and a promise that the federal funds would be used for that purpose.  The most likely scenario is that it will be renovated for the nursing program.

COLLEGE HOSTS COUNTY ECONOMIC LEADERSHIP SUMMIT IN PRESCOTT

Dr.  Rhine said meeting was the beginning of a  conversation about a “collaborative approach to economic development” for the County

About 90 persons gathered  at Yavapai College’s 2019 Economic Leadership Summit, held Tuesday, February 5, at the Prescott Club at Stoneridge. “Today is about starting a conversation,” said Yavapai College’s president, Dr. Lisa Rhine. We’re here today to begin the process of working, thinking and acting together – for the good of the economy and the citizens who call Yavapai County home.”

The event was sponsored by Yavapai College’s Regional Economic Development Center (REDC). It brought civic leaders together with local business owners, school superintendents and workforce analysts to identify existing economic trends and apply shared resources in response.

The summit began with a statistical portrait from Community College Institutional Research Director Dr. Tom Hughes. He described several “headwinds” preventing the county from expanding its industrial base: an aging population; low salaries and high housing prices that do not support a younger workforce; and a scarcity of the advanced training resources needed to compete in today’s job markets.

According to Trevor Stokes, from the Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity, Yavapai County must favorably position itself for emerging industries. Stokes said their must be collaboration to create the lifestyle and educational amenities companies crave and to establish a “regional identity” to make the county more competitive. Stokes gave several examples of small communities coordinating resources – most notably, the eastern Tennessee towns that worked together to lure a Volkswagen plant. “Is this a community that could benefit from getting all your different organizations collaborating on a regular basis to create a regional strategy?” He asked.


 

GOVERNING BOARD MEETS THIS TUESDAY ON PRESCOTT CAMPUS

Meeting set for February 12, 2019, at the Rock House at 1:00 p.m.

The Yavapai Community College Governing Board will hold its monthly general meeting on Tuesday, February 12, 2019.  It will take place on the Prescott Campus at the Rock House.

Community members are encouraged to address the Board on any subject near the beginning of the meeting.  They have three minutes in which to make their speech.

You may review the agenda for the meeting by clicking here.

 


 

PAST GOVERNING BOARD HAS SACRIFICED STUDENT SCHOLARSHIPS FOR BRICK AND MORTAR PROJECTS

Slashed student scholarships by hundreds of thousands in 2010-11 but approved a $103.5 million dollar building campaign in December 2013; to avoid taxpayer disapproval over 2013 project,  it used sparse tax dollars for capital projects and ignored need to replace student scholarship money 

Anyone familiar with how the College Governing Board has operated in the past can only scratch their head at how it so easily trashed student institutional scholarships in favor of  a $103.5 million dollar ten-year plan to essentially rebuild the campus and centers on the west side of the County.

Recall that back in 2010-11 the College claimed it faced a financial crisis. It based the claim on a large reduction in state financial assistance.  In response to the crisis,  about $1 million dollars in student institutional scholarships were eliminated from the general fund.  This meant that a very large number of deserving students no longer received scholarship aid; for many it probably meant no longer having access to post-secondary education.

Also recall that in December 2013 the College Administration created a $103.5 million dollar building plan, which the Governing Board approved in concept.  This plan was essentially aimed at  the campus and centers on the west side of the County.  Astonishingly, without a whimper from the  controlling West County voting bloc on the Board, the College moved ahead with the building plan financed from the general fund to pay for the construction. (Over repeated objection from east county former Board members Oliphant and  Filardo and present Board member McCasland.)

Since December 2013 the College has plowed ahead with its building project (reducing it to about $65 million) without showing any real concern for its decision to eliminate the $1 million dollar in scholarships in 2010-11. (After almost a decade, the Board may finally replace about $100,00 of the $1 million at the February 2019 meeting.)

In a better world, the funds from the budget should have gone to student scholarships over the past decade rather than for capital construction.

The reason students were shafted is clear.  The Governing Board feared sending the $103.5 development project to County voters and asking them to approve it via a General Obligation bond.   They might have rejected it. If approved, it would have created a secondary tax but left the primary taxes in the general fund for student scholarships. 

Because of  fear of not getting their way on the huge building project, the previous Board and previous administration sacrificed student scholarships. 

One hopes the new board and new administration will see students in a different light and give priority to scholarships over bricks and mortar. Replacing the $100,000 is a small step in the right direction.


 

SHOULD YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE ATHLETES FROM OUTSIDE YAVAPAI COUNTY RECEIVE ABOUT 75% OF ALL INSTITUTIONAL COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS?

Is this fair to County taxpayers and county students who are not allowed to compete for these scholarships?

Yavapai Community College annually places about $800,000 in a fund to support what are described as “institutional scholarships.” However, it appears there is not a fair opportunity for all students to apply and be selected for one of these scholarships.

When questioned during the January Governing Board meeting, the College Administration admitted that around $600,000 of those scholarships went mostly to athletes. (See Video). Moreover, most of the $600,000 went to the athletic program to provide scholarships for student athletes recruited outside Yavapai County.

In data obtained by the Blog via a public records request, the Community College reported that it spent $598,052 in scholarships for athletes recruited in 2017. This compares with a total award of tuition scholarships to athletes of $405,170 in 2010 (192,882 more than in 2017).

Isn’t it time for the Governing Board to seriously discuss whether the practice of setting aside 75% of all institutional scholarships for athletes  is a fair use of student tuition? One hopes that this discussion will take place at the February governing board meeting.


 

IS IT FAIR TO RAISE THE STUDENT TUITION TWICE THE INFLATION RATE ANNUALLY?

College has done so for over a decade  – Does requested 4.5% increase reflect the cost of attendance? Continue to increase student debt?

Yavapai Community College has increased its base tuition in each of the last ten years in some form. The tuition increase has been at least twice the annual inflation rate each year.  

For example, the inflation rate for 2019 is currently estimated at 2.3%, up a bit from 1.9% at the end of 2018.  However, the college is recommending a 4.5% increase for 2019 – 20. Last year (2018), the college recommended and received a 5% tuition increase and a 4% tax rate increase.

With a reduced staff and a significant drop in the number of students taking accredited classes, what is the justification for the increase? Hopefully, we’ll get some answers at the February Governing Board meeting.

The result of these increases is, of course to saddle many community college students with increased debt.


 

FAIRNESS DICTATES THE TIME HAS COME FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE FOR FACULTY/ STUDENTS/ STAFF ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE COUNTY

College can subsidize local caregivers comparable to the subsidy it now provides College Child Development Center on Prescott Campus; access is everything

Yavapai Community College has a wonderful child care program at the Dell Web Family Enrichment Center on the Prescott Campus.  As a part of that program, students and staff receive subsidized (discounted) charges for child care from Yavapai College.  The discounts are shown on the chart below, which was copied directly from the College web site.

Simple fairness should compel the College to establish comparable subsidized child care programs using independent care givers on the east side of the County.  By doing so, the College would significantly enhance the opportunities for families in Sedona and the entire Verde Valley of obtaining post-secondary education. It would also be a real help to staff.