Archive for Faculty – Page 3

Part 2: Dr. Bliss Report to Board on Faculty Survey

Dr. Bliss says survey can help “improve” Yavapai College; suggests much to be done if there is to be “shared governance”

In part 2 of this three-part series, Dr. Selena Bliss explains how the faculty survey on extending the academic year by two weeks can benefit the College. 

The videotape below (part 2 of 3) is about two minutes in length and follows her detailed explanation of the survey results that is found in part 1.  Part 3 of the series contains the Administration’s response to the Faculty survey.

 

Part 1: Dr. Bliss reports on adding two weeks to academic year

Analyzes faculty response to survey

At its April 17 meeting, Dr. Selona Bliss reported to the District Governing Board on the results of a faculty survey that focused on the Administration’s decision to add an additional week to each semester.  There were 101 total responses: 65 from full-time faculty and 36 from part-time faculty.

Part 1 of her report, which runs about five minutes, appears below.

Among the findings: (1) 62 of 102 support the proposed change. (2) 46 faculty felt there should be research on student impact of the change before moving forward and an additional 16 wanted to see research on the impact to retention. (3) 54 faculty said they were upset by the way in which the administration initially announced its plan. 30 faculty did not know about the initial decision.

There are several other findings discussed contained in the video tape below. 

 

YAVAPAI FACULTY WANT MORE RESEARCH BEFORE 16-WEEK SEMESTER ADOPTED

Overwhelmingly opposed to proposed change without adequate research

It is anticipated that the District Governing Board will be told at the April 18, 2017 Board meeting in Prescott that College faculty are presently overwhelmingly opposed to increasing regular classes from 15 to 16 weeks per semester. Faculty believe that such a move should not be made without first conducting serious research into its impact. This was one of the findings of the just completed Faculty Survey on the Academic Calendar.

In the survey to be discussed at the Governing Board meeting, faculty were asked: “What would you like to see (if anything), before moving to a 16-week calendar?” Forty-six of the faculty said that research on the impact to student success should be explored before going to the 16-week semester. Sixteen percent indicated research should be conducted on the impact of retention/ graduation before extending the semester. Another 5% responded that research should be conducted on how this would impact the Yavapai Community College “student demographic.”

The chart below was produced by the faculty and was contained in the agenda for Tuesday’s meeting.

FACULTY IGNORED BY ADMINISTRATION; CONTACT AAUP

“VEHEMENTLY” OPPOSED TO EXTENDING SEMESTER BY A WEEK

Dr. Selena Bliss, Yavapai Community College Faculty Senate president, stated at the March 7, 2017 Governing Board meeting that the administration had failed to properly consult the faculty regarding adding a week to a semester.  Under the administration proposal, semesters would go from fifteen  to sixteen weeks in length.

Bliss provided a long list of meetings where the faculty had asked for “clear and compelling evidence” (data) to support adding the week. However, the administration had failed to respond to the repeated requests.

A similar proposal has been rejected by the faculty in the past. On October 21, 2016 the faculty Senate said it was “vehemently opposed to being forced” to accept the additional week.

Bliss stated that the faculty was disappointed with the process and “lack of reasons” coming from the administration that would support an additional week. Out of frustration, the faculty had consulted the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), which advised taking the matter directly to the President and the Board.

 Bliss also stated that the “shared governance” model adopted by Yavapai College requires communication, collaboration, and respect.“ Based on her report, the administration had failed to follow “the spirit” of that model.

Bliss said that “reasons” for adding the week “are alluding us.”  She detailed the history of communication between the faculty and the administration from November to March without resolution of the request for data from the administration to support the extension.

It appears that the administration has reset an announcement regarding the semester schedule until April 1, which will give it time to provide “reasons” to the faculty for the change.  Meanwhile, the faculty will survey full-time and adjunct faculty and possibly students to obtain an overall reaction to the proposal.

The complete report as delivered to the Governing Board by Dr. Bliss may be viewed below.

 

VP Ewell confirms Liss is new VP

Ewell says appointment confirmed during talk before Sedona City Council 

Vice President of Finance, Clint Ewell, announced at the  Sedona City Council   late afternoon March 22 meeting that Dr. Ron Liss had confirmed he would take the post of Vice President of Instruction and Student Development at Yavapai College.  He will begin in June, 2016.

Ron Liss VP

Ron Liss confirmed as new VP

 As of March 23, there still had been no formal announcement coming from the College. However, the rumors received by the Blog regarding this appointment turned out to be correct as confirmed by Dr. Ewell at the Sedona meeting.

Dr. James Perey, the Executive Dean of the Verde Campus and Sedona Center, was out of town when the announcement was made.

You may view the Ewell statement at the Sedona City Council meeting by clicking here.

You may view Dr. Liss’s credentials by clicking here.

Faculty Association priorities

Faculty Association sets priorities for the coming academic year

PROFESSOR GORMAN 1Professor David Gorman, president-elect of the Yavapai Community College Faculty Association, provided the Governing Board with the priorities it has set for the coming academic year at the August 12 Board meeting. They include: (a) continuing the student success initiative, (b) creating department chairs for some departments with the goal of improving two-way communication between faculty and the administration,  (c) getting faculty more involved in the budgeting process, and (d) carefully reviewing the dual enrollment program. To hear and view Professor Gorman’s report to the Governing Board in its entirety, you may click here.