ADVANCED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GRADUATE (AMP), 1979
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS – NEW YORK, NY
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA), 1966
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW – NEW YORK, NY
BACHELOR OF LAW (LL.B), 1966 COLUMBIA COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY – NEW YORK, NY
BACHELOR OF ARTS MAJOR IN GOVERNMENT (B.A.), 1960
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL ALUMNI COUNCIL, 1986-1989
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
DIRECTOR, 1981-1989
PRESIDENT, 1984-1985
ARIZONA HUMANITIES COUNCIL 2003-2004
SEDONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 2008- 2013, CHAIR 2011-2013
YAVAPAI COLLEGE VERDE VALLEY BOARD ADVISORY COMMITTEE, CHAIR 2014-(Committee suspended by Board in late 2016)
SEDONA RED ROCK REVIEW NEWSPAPER COLUMNIST 2001 -2008
LOS ANGELES CENTER FOR NON-PROFIT MANAGEMENT. DIRECTOR, 1984-198
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT LAW COUNCIL
DIRECTOR, 1984-1991
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, 1985-1990
PRESIDENT, 1989
NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION – EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMITTEE
MEMBER, 1972-1993
CHAIR 1979-1982
NATIONAL BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE – EMPLOYEE RELATIONS COMMITTEE
STAFF REPRESENTATIVE, 1985-1993
JONATHAN ART FOUNDATION, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
(CURRENTLY THE FOUNDATION HAS OVER 6 MILLION $ OF EARLY
CALIFORNIA PAINTINGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS THAT IT LOANS TO MUSEUMS,
AND SHOWS FOR THE PUBLIC.)
FOUNDER, 1987
PRESIDENT, 1987-1990
CHAIRMAN EMERITUS, 1990-PRESENT
ACTIVE DUTY UNITED STATES NAVY, 1960-1963
SERVED AS A NAVY OFFICER (FINAL RANK LT.) ON THE USS KITTY HAWK (CVA-63) MY MAIN DUTIES: FLEET OFFICER OF THE DECK UNDERWAY AND SHIP’S LEGAL OFFICER.
CONSULTANT, 1994-1998
INVESTIGATIVE CONSULTING WITH REGARD TO DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT ISSUES.FOR DISNEY, DREAM WORKS, AND OTHER MULTI NATIONAL BUSINESSES AND NATIONAL LAW FIRMS
CARTER HAWLEY HALE STORES, INC. LOS ANGELES, CA, 1972-1993
(RENAMED BROADWAY STORES INC. AND TODAY MOSTLY PART OF MACY’S)
AT THE TIME CHH WAS A $4 BILLION IN SALES RETAIL CORPORATION WITH OVER 40,000 REGULAR EMPLOYEES IN ITS BROADWAY, EMPORIUM, CAPWELLS, CONTEMPO CASUALS, WEINSTOCK’S, NEIMAN MARCUS, BERGDORF GOODMAN AND WALDENBOOKS STORES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND HOLT-FENFREW IN CANADA.
DUTIES; CORPORATE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
LITIGATED BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD AND STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS INCLUDING THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
RESOLVING EMPLOYEE COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION OR HARASSMENT.
DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICIES.
HANDLING ALL LABOR RELATIONS WITH UNIONS.
DEVELOPING AND MANAGING THE CORPORATIONS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS INCLUDING MEDICAL AND PENSIONS
MONTGOMERY WARD & CO. – CHICAGO ILLINOIS & OAKLAND, CA 1967-1972
AT THIS TIME MONTGOMERY WARD WAS A $2 BILLION IN SALES NATIONAL RETAILER WITH OVER 40,000 EMPLOYEES.
DIRECTOR, LABOR RELATIONS, WESTERN REGION – 8 STATES
Mr. Bracety is well known in the community and has resided here for eighteen (18) years. He has held many positions within the hospitality industry, including service as the General Manager of the Prescott Resort and Conference Center. He is currently the Vice President of Operations and Talent Management with the Grace Hospitality Group.
Mr. Bracety holds a Bachelor of Science Degree from Buffalo State College and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the University of Phoenix. Mr. Bracety is married, and the couple have a daughter that is a junior at Northern Arizona University.
He has served as the President of the Prescott Frontier Rotary, was named the 2014 Man of the Year by Prescott Area Leadership, has served as the Board Chair of the Prescott Valley Chamber of Commerce. He was formerly on the Board of Directors of the Arizona Hotel and Lodging Association. He has served on the Board of Directors for the Yavapai County Big Brothers and Big Sisters, is the Past President of the Prescott Fine Arts Association, and Past Board Chair of the Arizona Community Foundation. Mr. Bracety was the Founder of the City of Prescott Tourism Advisory Committee.
He has been working with various non-profits for many years on joint educational projects. An example was a recent early childhood literacy initiative, which had tremendous success, under the leadership of the Arizona Community Foundation of Yavapai County, which partnered with community stakeholders for financial support and was operated by the Yavapai County Education Service Agency (YCESA).
District 5 includes the following areas:
Aerie Townhouses Camp Pinerock Glassford Hill
Antelope Meadows Camp Wamatochick Golden Condos
Big Bug Creek Area Castle Canyon Granite Dells
Big Sky Coyote Springs Granville
Bradshaw Pines Camp Creekside of Prescott Groom Creek
Breezy Pine Dana Condominiums Hidden Valley
Camp Maripai Diamond Valley Highlands Center
Jasper Prescott Reamended Preston Condominiums
Kamp Kipa Prescott Valley Pronghorn Ranch
Leigh Condos Prescott Valley Santa Fe Quad Villas
Loba Estates Prescott Valley Superstition Addition Ranch at Prescott
Loma Estates Prescott Valley Unit 1 Roundup Condos
Lynx Creek Prescott Valley Unit 10 SkyYCamp
Lynx Lake Prescott Valley Unit 11 Small Tracts
Lynx Mountain View Prescott Valley Unit 12 Spruce Mountain Club
Millsite Village Prescott Valley Unit 13 Stevens Condominiums
Mingus View Prescott Valley Unit 14 Stoneridge
Mountain Glen Prescott Valley Unit 15 Storm Ranch
Mountain Pine Prescott Valley Unit 16 Tapestry at Granville Apartments
Mountain Shadows Prescott Valley Unit 17 The Ranch
Navajo Commons Prescott Valley Unit 18 The Viewpoint
Noah Berry Prescott Valley Unit 19 Upper Groom
Nugget Patch Prescott Valley Unit 2 Upper Little Copper Creek
Oak Knoll Prescott Valley Unit 20 Victorian Estates
Parbac Condominium Prescott Valley Unit 24 Viewpoint
Patterdell Pines Prescott Valley Unit 3 Walker
Pine Creek Area Prescott Valley Unit 4 Walker Final
Pine Hills Prescott Valley Unit 5 Webfoot Subdivision
Pinehurst Estates Prescott Valley Unit 6 Western Mesa
Poquito Valley Prescott Valley Unit 7 Whispering Pines Camp
Potato Patch Prescott Valley Unit 8 Yavapai Hills
Prescott Commerce Prescott Valley Unit 9 Zone 12
Prescott East Prescott Pines Camp
OPINION. The Yavapai Community College Governing Board has one employee who reports to it and for whom it is responsible: the President. Yet, the Board has made no demands that the President properly inform it on a regular basis in detail about certain projects and programs costing thousands in taxpayer dollars.
POOR REPORTING TO BOARD. One vivid illustration of the Board’s lack of concern with the poor reporting record occurred during the October 2022 meeting when housing on the Verde Campus was a topic. The information about the Community College’s expensive 3D cement printer project begun in February 2020 arose only inadvertently during the discussion.
3D PRINTERS COST OVER $400,000.00 OF TAXPAYER MONEY. You may recall that in February 2020 the Yavapai Community College District Governing Board was asked by College administrators to amend its budget and authorize spending at least $400,000.00 dollars to purchase two futuristic 3D cement construction printers (a big one and a little one). It was an expensive investment in an experiment. (You may view the report made to the Governing Board in February 2020 about this project on the following video clip. https://www.screencast.com/t/Pbakk3g1
CHINO REPLACEMENT STILL NOT BUILT. When the announcement about the purchase was made in 2020, the College said the big machine could be used “that summer” to build a small home on the Chino Valley Campus to replace a manufactured one owned by the College that is need of repair. That idea seems to have been abandoned. Rather, three home sites have been created at the Chino Valley Campus. None as of October 2022 have apparently yet been successfully constructed.
Moreover, because the newly purchased machine had to rebuilt, the goal of using it in the summer of 2020 vanished. It has still not been used successfully.
Also, at the time of the original announcement, there was some thought the smaller machine would end up at the Verde Campus. However, the small machine ended up at CTEC where it is used experimentally to test various grades of cement.
Career and Technical Education Center Dean John Morgan, who has been in charge of the cement 3D printer project, provided the Board with some information about the 3D machine at the October meeting. (Click here to see video clip of Dean Morgan commenting to the Governing Board on the project at the October Governing Board meeting.)
MAJOR STAFF HEADACHE. It turns out that the project has been, at best, a major headache for Morgan and members of his staff. He described working with the 3D printer project as having “been a difficult journey.” He said the College has been “delayed on several fronts.” Astonishingly, he also said the large half million dollar machine purchased by the College “had to be completely rebuilt.” No one on the Board asked about the reason for rebuilding the machine or the cost to the Community College in terms of labor and parts.
BUILDING EFFORTS NOT SUCCESSFUL. Dean Morgan said that there had been at least two unsuccessful attempts at using the machine. However, he was hopeful that a third effort at utilizing it would be successful. No one on the Board asked for a clearer explanation regarding the reasons for the two failures.
Dean Morgan emphasized that operating the big 3D cement printing machine is very technical with a steep learning curve. The complexity appears to make it doubtful that it will find much use by students in building anything.
SHORTAGE OF CONCRETE. He also informed the Board that the project faces an immediate problem of a concrete shortage. “Local builders,” he said, are “allotted how much they can get in a week.” Because of the limited availability of concrete and its cost, the College is now trying to shift to using ash rather than concrete in its building experiment. According to Morgan, if ash can be used, it is 30% less than concrete.
NO COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT. The College apparently never set up a Committee to work with the development of this expensive venture, which seemed to one Board member as unusual.
UNIFORMED. The College has still not informed the Board in public of the major issues associated with building 3D constructed structures in Arizona such as the impact major daily temperatures have on construction, that at present engineering estimates are that it costs as much to build a 3D printed house as a stick-built house, or that there has been a tendency for cracks in concrete walls to show up in early experiments.
SHOULD IT CONTINUE? There is a major question at this point regarding the efficacy of going forward with the project. Are the future costs worth the potential benefits? It is a question no one on the Board is prepared to ask. Probably because the project remains pretty much in the dark as far as actual knowledge is concerned.
If you want to see one of the first efforts at building a concrete home in Arizona, with an engineer’s explanation of some of the problems, there is an excellent video in the ENR Engineering News-Record. Here is the link to the page that has the video on it (be careful, you only have one chance to open this page and see the video. After that, they want you to purchase a monthly subscription.) https://www.enr.com/articles/51972-house-made-of-3d-printed-concrete-goes-up-in-arizona .
You can view a video clip of Dean Morgan’s comments to the Governing Board about the two machines made at the October meeting by clicking here.
SOURCES FOR THIS STORY INCLUDE: October, 2022 Governing Board Business Meeting and various Blog articles listed below that you can view.
(Blog Article) https://eyesonyavapaicollege.com/ctec/college-purchased-two-3d-cement-construction-printers-with-half-million-dollar-decision/
(Blog Article) https://eyesonyavapaicollege.com/ctec/architect-explains-how-new-3d-cement-construction-printer-can-be-used/
Listed below for your information are some videos describing the problems associated with 3D printing of homes and some information about the first cement house built in Tempe, Arizona.
https://architizer.com/blog/practice/details/3d-printed-buildings-future-or-gimmick/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz1LM9kwRLY (outlines general overall problems)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3N9UudQZVCs
There are two items of important business to be conducted at the Governing Board meeting on Monday, May 14. One of them is the President’s contract.
Exactly what aspect of the contract is to be considered is not clear from the agenda posting. Recall that the Yavapai Community College District Governing Board voted to increase the base pay of Dr. Lisa Rhine by ten percent at the Board Workshop held May 24, 2022. It also added an extra year to her five-year contract. The pay-raise of 10% and contract extension vote was identical to the raise and extension awarded in 2021.
This was a generous base-pay increase when compared to how faculty and staff increases were treated just a week earlier. Recall that at the May 17 General Board meeting the Board approved a 4% across-the-board salary increase, .45% one-time bonus, and 1.3% for market adjustments, etc. for all staff and faculty.
At the time of its May decision, the Governing Board did not provide any indication of Dr. Rhine’s current base salary. Most observers believe it is nearing $300,000 annually. Dr. Rhine is the highest paid Yavapai County officer.
Now, just six months later, the question of the President’s employment agreement will be discussed in secret during Monday’s “workshop.” In a vaguely worded statement, the agenda for the meeting says that there will be “Discussion or Consultation for Legal Advice with the Board’s Attorney Regarding the President’s Employment Contract and to consider its position and instruct its attorney regarding the President’s Employment Contract.” It goes on to say that there will be “Possible Action RE: President’s Evaluation and Consideration of President’s Contract as a result of Executive Session.”
It is anticipated that nothing significant regarding the contract talks will be divulged to the public.
The Board will also be asked to delegate Board authority by approving a resolution regarding “infrastructure.” It is not clear why such a resolution is needed. (See draft copy of resolution below:
YAVAPAI COLLEGE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE PRESIDENT TO CREATE THE NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE TO MEET THE CHANGING NEEDS OF STUDENTS AND EMPLOYERS RESOLUTION 2022-10
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the District Governing Board is the legally constituted and final authority for the operation of Yavapai County Community College District, including any policies that govern the College;
WHEREAS, the Governing Board’s responsibility includes 1) governing the College as a whole, and 2) delegating authority to the President to perform and oversee the daily operations and administrative functions of the College;
WHEREAS, the Governing Board understands that new educational content providers and distribution in the higher education marketplace are driving up institutional competition and consumer choice;
WHEREAS, the Governing Board understands that enrollments in traditional community colleges are declining nationally and in Arizona and are increasing in four-year institutions;
WHEREAS, the Governing Board understands that Arizona public universities are now piloting 2-year Associate Degrees, offering short-term credentials and noncredit workforce offerings, and placing regional economic development centers in our counties to grow their enrollments;
WHEREAS, the Governing Board understands that in order to meet the changing needs of learners in the knowledge economy, community colleges must be prepared to adopt and implement new, innovative strategies for delivering educational opportunities;
WHEREAS, the Governing Board believes that the College plays an instrumental role in meeting the needs of students and employers and that an expanded and effective infrastructure is vital to the continued operations of the College, so that Board goals are realized;
ENACTMENTS:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Yavapai County Community College District Governing Board delegates to the President the authority and responsibility for creating an infrastructure that meets the changing needs of today’s learners and provides workforce driven educational opportunities, which shall be based on the following principles:
NOW, BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the Governing Board delegates to the President such additional authority as is necessary to ensure that College operations meet the changing needs of our students and employers.
The Governing Board shall retain all powers and duties as prescribed by law that are not formally delegated in this Resolution or Board Policies.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Yavapai County Community College District Governing Board this 14 day of November, 2022.
Ms. Deb McCasland, Board Chair Approved as to form:
Mr. Ray Sigafoos, Board Secretary
====================================================================
Yavapai County covers 8,125 square miles and compares in size with Connecticut, Delaware, Rhode Island and New Jersey. It is about the size of the nation of Israel. It is only slightly smaller than Maricopa, County, Arizona. Maricopa covers 9,224 square miles and is the fourth largest county in the United States.
The County is divided by the Black Hills mountain range that runs west and east with Mingus mountain creating a natural physical barrier between the two sides of the County. There are few roads connecting the concentrated population centers in the west region of the County with the more rural areas in the east. For many, the most direct route in the east region to the west region is a single-lane alternate highway 89-A. It somewhat perilously crawls over Mingus Mountain at 7,815 feet.
During the winter, passage using highway 89A over the mountain range can be dangerous because of ice and snow packed roads. There is no public or private transportation between the east and west sides of the County.
The College has invested thousands of dollars on expensive television equipment, renovating the Rock House in part specifically for tv, and has asked for thousands more to create a tv facility on the Prescott Campus. Despite the taxpayer investment, purchase of equipment, and availability of easy live broadcasting on the College’s YouTube channel of its handful of yearly meeting, the District Governing Board, according to its Chair, has decided to no longer live-stream the events. That leaves faculty, students, interested residents, and especially those with disabilities in the dark waiting until the video is eventually posted at a time when memories may have faded and important actions taken without resident knowledge have been made.
In some cases, such as the May 2022 budget meeting, the video of the Board meeting was not posted to the website until four months after the meeting in late September. Think of that!
Late posting allows the College Board and the College itself to spread and sculpture their views of what transpired at a Board meeting. The Board can rely on declining interest in a topic over time to accommodate their lag in producing the video or posting detailed minutes for public review.
If you are in the know about how to eventually find a Board video before it is actually posted to the website, and only a few in the County are, the College will send you a link to the video a few days after it was held. But you must wait. You also must know that your request needs to be sent to the College President’s administrative assistant. Of course, this information is kept from the public because nowhere on the Board website or anywhere else is the public informed of how to obtain a link to the video.
Third District Governing Board Representative Paul Chevalier, who is concerned that matters not be so easily covered up from residents by the College and Board, recently asked the Board Chair the reason the live streaming had ceased. The Chair replied: “With our meetings open to the public now that there are no Covid restrictions, we are not live streaming our meetings on uTube. UTube was a Covid accommodation for the Open Meeting Law. The meetings are still being recorded and can be requested through Yvonne or view it on the college website as we have done for many years.”
The Chair may not realize that the Videos are not promptly posted after a meeting, but are posted on the Board website only after minutes are approved. This may be months following a meeting. The Chair may also not realize that there is no information posted on the Board website so that members of the public, faculty or students know to whom and how to request a link to the video. The Chair may not realize that the videos are not available until three business days after the meeting has passed, even if you know where to find them.
Mr. Chevalier’s initial request that the College live stream the handful of Board meetings was turned down by the Chair. He wrote in an email to the Chair asking for reconsideration and saying that:
“People find it quicker and more convenient than waiting for and getting into our videos. . . . I am aware of City Councils in our county that regularly stream their meetings through YouTube. Is that difficult or expensive for us to do? If not, I believe it would be a good service to the interested public we serve. Please reconsider.”
The Chair indicated there would not be reconsideration.
Mr. Chevalier noted in his emails to the Chair that the County can expect “more covid cases this winter,” which apparently had no effect.
In the end, the District Governing Board continues to draw a curtain of semi-secrecy about its proceedings. Unlike in the past, agendas are posted to the Governing Board website without attachments; they are as short as possible. PowerPoint slides, once always posted to the Board website prior to Board meetings, are no longer posted. Minutes of the meetings themselves are summary and do not contain important comments from various Board members. Videos that are being produced with sometimes defective sound, poor lighting, interviews with the public without aueio, and overall poor video production. PowerPoint slides being used by a speaker may not appear anywhere on video (or in draft minutes).
It’s hard to believe that a Governing Board of a Community College has yet to recognize it’s the 21 century. And, that it is regressing to the 19th century in record keeping and accountability.
Or, is the College and this Governing Board simply trying to run from accountability to students, faculty, and the residents of Yavapai County?
The Governing Board’s long agenda and overworked administrative staff have caused the minutes of Board meetings to be shorter and more succinct than in the past. They no longer, for example, contain brief summaries of positions taken by Board members. This has been a concern of Representative Ray Sigafoos.
Representative Sigafoos urged the Board to adopt a policy that would require the minutes to contain in brief summary fashion relevant comments and positions taken by Board members during a Board meeting. He viewed a paper record as a more reliable historical record of various decisions made by the Governing Board.
Representative Chevalier agreed with Mr. Sigafoos regarding adding relevant comments and in addition argued he was concerned with equality as some Board member comments were included in the minutes but some of his comments were not. (See video tape link in re this discussion.)
A majority (Ms. McCasland, Mr. Padilla, Mr. Kuknyo) disagreed. Mr. Padilla argued that a video recording of the meeting was sufficient for historical purposes. When he weighed the number of hours it might take for an administrator to properly prepare minutes that included relevant summaries of positions taken by Board members against the availability of a video record, he came out on the side of the video record and administrative efficiency. His arguments carried the day.
On the question of treating comments of Board members equally, the majority decided to remove comments from a May 17 meeting made by Mr. Sigafoos rather than include the comments of Mr. Chevalier made at the same meeting.
The presidents of Coconino Community College, Mohave Community College, Northland Pioneer College, and Yavapai College recently signed an intergovernmental agreement called the Northern Arizona Community College Partnership (NACCP). According to a press release from Yavapai Community College, the agreement calls on the districts to collaborate and combine resources to better serve citizens and communities throughout northern Arizona. This includes sharing college courses to improve student success and completion and enhancing workforce development by utilizing each district’s vast array of unique programs.
The agreement states that the districts will “exercise efficient and maximal use of available educational resources through common and complementary resources of each institution.”
The colleges will specifically focus efforts to collaborate in areas of credit and non-credit offerings, curriculum development, data sharing, business functions, student services, and other support services to provide a cooperative higher education network for residents of Northern Arizona which includes Mohave, Navajo, Apache, Yavapai and Coconino Counties.
It is not clear how they will carry out their collaboration and no examples were given at the September Governing Board meeting.
The four northern Arizona college districts claim they will also work together to strengthen their partnerships with K-12 institutions, universities, and workforce development partners.
Board members from each district approved the agreement, and the districts began working together under the agreement on October 1, 2022. The issue was placed on the September 27 consent agenda for approval by the Yavapai Community College District Governing Board. It was approved without comment by the President or discussion.
Sources: Yavapai Community College Governing Board meeting September 27, 2022; Yavapai Community College press release dated October 3, 2022.