Archive for GOVERNING BOARD – Page 7

DRAFT PROFILE FOR NEXT YAVAPAI PRESIDENT TRIES TO LOCK IN AWFUL POLICY GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND POLICIES

Despite repeated criticism from East side representatives over the past several years, Yavapai Community College wants to continue a policy governance program that hides responsibility and accountability from public; statement in draft profile erroneously anticipates how new January Governing Board will function

The draft profile for the next Yavapai Community College president is now posted online (See it in full by clicking here.)  The most controversial language in it refers to retaining the awful Carver Policy Governance policies.  These are policies that were designed for large corporations; not for public universities and colleges.  And certainly not for Yavapai College where its direction comes from five elected officials.

The College administration loves the policy governance model because it allows the President and his or her executives to easily hide or obfuscate important information about College programs and capital development from the public and the Governing Board.  It prevents the Board from setting simple, straight-forward goals such as increasing enrollment by 5% in two years.  Or, creating a specific capital and programming vision for the Verde Campus for the next five years.

The current policy governance model has been criticized by former Governing Board members Al Filardo and Bob Oliphant.  Current second district representative Deb McCasland has repeatedly publicly  pointed out since she was elected how the policy governance model as applied at Yavapai College hides information from the Board and the public.

Despite the enormous amount of criticism, the draft says the “DBG is committed to and practices Policy Governance.”  The statement is false in the sense that the District Governing Board can drop the practice and is almost certain to do so if new members are elected to the Governing Board in November of this year. 


 

WILL RAY SIGAFOOS RUN IN NOVEMBER FOR HIS SEAT?

Tells Governing Board he has medical issues but offers no specifics

There is a question whether Ray Sigafoos, who represents District 1, will run for his seat on the College Governing Board in November.  At the May Board meeting, he indicated that he had certain medical issues at the present time.  His present term expires: December 31, 2018.

Sigafoos has lived and worked in Prescott for almost a half century, all of the time as a resident of District 1. Tim Carter and a committee appointed Sigafoos from among four applicants for the Board position that opened in October 2005 when Board Member Ed Harris died.

District 1 includes the following: Badger, Bagdad, Castle Hot Springs 1 and 2, Congress, Copper Basin, Hidden Valley, Hillside, Holiday/Well Fargo, Kirkland, Mile High, Miller Valley East and West, Montana, Mountain Club, Northside, Pine Knoll, Pine Lakes, Ponderosa, Prescott Heights, Prescott Northwest, Prescott South, Prescott Southwest, Prescott West, Rincon, Rose Lakes, Senator, Skull Valley, Taylor Hicks, Thumb Butte/Dearing Pk, Walnut Grove, White Spar, and Yarnell.

A short clip of Mr. Sigafoos off-hand statement at the Board meeting is attached below.

 

WHY IS PUBLIC/PRESS BARRED FROM OBSERVING POLITICAL GATHERING REGARDING FUTURE OF COLLEGE?

April 13 event  on Verde Valley Campus has College inviting mayors and other public officials to share impressions and ideas but public and press barred as observers

Commentary

Yavapai Community College will hold an invitation only forum described as an effort to obtain “local feedback on the College’s performance and role it can play in their communities” on April 13 in the Community Room, Verde Valley Campus from 10 AM to 11:30 AM. The College is inviting a select group of public officials and is controlling the agenda for the meeting.

The Community College refuses to allow anyone from the public or the press to attend and observe the meeting. One Governing Board member, Connie Harris, thinks this is a good idea. She said it is a good idea because it provides a “safe with anonymous feedback.” So much for open discussion about the College.

The College understands that running a closed meeting like this allows it to avoid anyone with knowledge of College operations from challenging the report of the meeting that it will later issue. It also prevents anyone with knowledge of College operations from raising questions about the efficacy of views and statements made. This kind of approach, however, is consistent with the Colleges iron-fisted control over all of its operation.  It views itself more as a private corporation; not a taxpayer public institution accountable to the citizens of the County.

The College will limit the number of Board members who can attend this meeting to two. Otherwise, it would require the meeting to be open pursuant to Arizona’s Open Meeting Law.

———————————————————————-

 

WILLS EQUATES PRIVATE TALKS WITH BOARD MEMBERS WITH “TRANSPARENCY”

McCasland argues “transparency” means public discussion

The question of transparency of Board decisions and the affect of private Board discussions with President Penelope Wills came up during the February 2018 Board meeting.  Representative Deb McCasland has consistently argued that the Governing Board should discuss more issues openly during Board meetings.

President Wills urged McCasland to call her about concerns she has saying that she hears from Board members privately on areas such as music, athletics, budgets. When McCasland replied that such discussion should be transparent, Wills’ agreed but equated the private discussions to “transparency.”

See if you agree after viewing the short clip below.