Archive for Politics – Page 4

LINDA THOR AND JACQUELINE SMITH WIN SEATS ON MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE GOVERNING BOARD

Did negative tactics used by winners help cement a victory?

Incumbent Linda Thor and Jacqueline Smith won four-year seats on the Maricopa Community College Governing Board.  Thor won over Shelli Boggs and Smith defeated incumbent Laurin Hendrix. They will serve as at large members of the Governing Board. 

As reporter Anne Ryman wrote  in her article in the Arizona Republic of November 3, this was “the most unusual [Governing Board election] in recent memory as far as campaign tactics.”  The Blog agrees.

During the campaign, opponents of losing candidate Boggs sent out a  campaign mailer that showed a recent photo of her wearing a red tank top, mirrored sunglasses and holding an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle. The mailer read: “Shelli Boggs couldn’t be trusted with children in a classroom. We can’t trust her on the Maricopa Community Colleges Board!” Boggs opponents also claimed she was “forced out” of her job as a cosmetology instructor over complaints she belittled and bullied students. Boggs denied the allegations.

The incumbent and loser, Laurin Hendrix, had his web site address taken over by Smith during the campaign.  Smith then  posted messages urging people to vote Hendrix out of office. Smith told the Arizona Republic that  she was curious about Hendrix’s platform so she looked up the internet domain name www.lowertuitionnow.com advertised on his campaign signs. She said she found the domain name was available,  took  ownership and began posting information about Hendrix.

Hendrix told the Arizona Republic he was unaware that Smith owned the domain name he had used in the 2016 board election. Hendrix said he reused campaign signs this year from the 2016 election and was unaware the website listed on his signs hadn’t been kept active.

Sources:  Anne Ryman, November 3, 2020 story in Arizona Republic; Anne Ryman, October 18, 2020    story  in Arizona Republic.

MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD RACE IS HEATED

Unusual campaign tactics used as candidates vie for  Board positions

The Maricopa Community College District Governing Board race has become heated for at least two of the four candidates seeking office this year.  In a story written by Anne Ryman in the Arizona Republic on Sunday, October 18, the campaigns of  candidate Shelli Boggs and incumbent Laurin Hendrix appear to have become involved in unusual stormy political tactics for these nonpartisan positions.  

Ryman reported  in her story that those opposing Shelli Boggs mailed flyers showing Boggs holding an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle and alleging she was “forced out” of her job as a cosmetology instructor over complaints she belittled and bullied students. Boggs  has denied  the allegations. The mailer reads: “Shelli Boggs couldn’t be trusted with children in a classroom. We can’t trust her on the Maricopa Community Colleges Board!”

Incumbent Linda Thor is opposing Shelli Boggs in the election. Thor claims that the current governing board, “is the most partisan board I have ever seen, and it’s not good for us to operate this way.”

 When the internet domain name used by Governing Board incumbent Laurin Hendrix expired, the web site  was taken over by his challenger, Jacqueline Smith.  Smith then started  posting messages using the web site  urging people to vote Hendrix out of office.

Smith said she was curious about Hendrix’s platform so she looked up the internet domain name www.lowertuitionnow. com advertised on his campaign signs. She found the domain name was available so she took ownership and began posting information about Hendrix. “It seemed like an opportunity to promote my campaign, and it seemed to really make my point that he’s not giving the attention to detail and focus to our community colleges,” she said.

You may read much more about the election squabbles among the Maricopa District Governing Board in Ms. Ryman’s article in the Arizona Republic, although you may have to be a subscriber. 

 

 

 

MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER IN HOT WATER OVER ALLEGED INTERFERENCE WITH SEARCH FOR NEW CHANCELLOR

Search stopped in August; will start over because of actions attributed to Governing Board member Kathleen Winn

The search for a new chancellor at Maricopa Community College was allegedly disrupted and stopped in August because of  the actions of a single Governing Board member on the search committee, Kathleen Winn.  In an article in Inside High Ed, reporter Madeline St. Amour wrote that an investigation found that Winn, who was a member of the search committee for a new chancellor,  tainted the process “by violating a confidentiality agreement and attempting to persuade a candidate to not apply for the position.”

Winn is  an at-large member of the board and her  term expires in 2022.  She was previously accused of violating campaign finance law along with Tom Horne, former attorney general for Arizona, during his run in the state’s 2010 election, according to the Phoenix News Times.

A  statement published by Inside Higher Ed from  Maricopa District Governing Board president Marie Sullivan on behalf of the Board read as follows:

 “As the process began, different individuals started relaying uncomfortable and possibly inappropriate conversations with Ms. Winn concerning her preferences for the chancellor position. It is important to note that everyone on the search committee had been advised to only discuss the candidates with a select few individuals who were authorized for those conversations. Ms. Winn also signed a confidentiality agreement which clearly stated the appropriate way to conduct the search for the next chancellor and also clearly stated many actions not to take. Unfortunately, it now appears Ms. Winn violated numerous provisions within her signed confidentiality agreement. Based on the findings of the investigation, I am deeply disappointed. As a governing board, we owe our students, faculty and those who elect us with the highest fidelity of conduct. Unfortunately, it now appears that Ms. Winn did not comport herself accordingly.”

You may read the entire article by Inside Higher Ed reporter Madeline St. Amour by clicking here. 

DR. RITA CHENG STEPPING DOWN AS NAU PRESIDENT

Search for replacement beginning this fall

Dr. Rita Cheng

The Arizona Republic reported on September 8, 2020 in a story by Rachel Leingang that Northern Arizona University President Rita Cheng will be stepping down as the president of Northern Arizona University. 

Dr. Cheng is  the 16th president of NAU and began in that position  in 2014. She will serve as president until a replacement is named by the regents.

According to the report, the NAU Board plans to start a national search for a replacement this fall. Dr. Cheng’s  contract was last extended in 2019 and expires in June 2022. However, depending on the length of the search, she could leave the position before her contract expires or she could finish it out.

Source:  Arizona Republic, September 8, 2020 story by Rachel Leingang. You may view the entire story online by clicking here.

 

CHEVALIER RESPONDS TO BOARD TRANSPARENCY LETTER; CITES CONCERN WITH OBTAINING ACCURATE PROGRAM COSTS IN SOME DEPARTMENTS, TAX RATES, AND OVERALL COSTS

Argues greater transparency will allow the public to “know how the college is spending its money,  then actions can be taken to eliminate expenditures that are extravagant or unnecessary”

Third District Paul Chevalier publicly responded to the letter adopted by the Yavapai Community College Governing Board at its Governing Board meeting on September 8 regarding transparency in his individual capacity as the Third District Yavapai Community College Representative.  In his response, Chevalier  compared the College’s 28 page $84 million budget with entities such as the cities of Cottonwood (budget 310 pages), Prescott (307 pages) and Prescott Valley (309 pages), NAU (187 pages) and others.

Chevalier claims in his letter that various departments are not transparent in terms of budgets including the department operating the athletic program, tennis court and indoor swimming pool.  He claims he has no idea about  the individual costs associated with operating each of those programs.

He also raised issues about comparative tax rates and his obligation to protect the public as an elected representative.  Rather than elaborate further,  you may read his response below for more details.

My Response –Paul Chevalier 

Yavapai College Board Member representing District 3.

No doubt my fellow Yavapai College Board members believe the budget the college presents to the Board provides them with sufficient information to make good budget decisions.  It does not provide me with enough information to do that – not even close.

Our Yavapai College budget is 28 pages long.  Compare this with the other public entities in our County and nearby.  Cottonwood’s budget is 310 pages, Prescott’s is 307 pages, Prescott Valley’s is 330 pages, Sedona’s is 390 pages and NAU’s is 187 pages. These are detailed transparent budget. A 28 page budget for an entity with a budget like Yavapai College’s of  $84 million dollars can neither be detailed or transparent. It is impossible.

Let’s take the case of Athletics information. ATHLETICS IS NOT EVEN MENTIONED ANYWHERE IN THE YAVAPAI COLLEGE BUDGET. Not one single word or number. That is not transparency. There should be plenty of information in the budget about athletics because Yavapai College sponsors four athletic teams. In addition to the teams we also have a seven court tennis complex recently renovated at a cost in the high 100,000’s of dollars of taxpayer money. It is located in Prescott. Note: Yavapai College does not have a tennis team.  These courts are mainly used by Prescott or nearby residents. The same goes for an Olympic swimming pool located on the Prescott, campus. Yavapai College has no swim team. Mainly residents use it. Do we know anything about the cost to the taxpayers of any of this? No.  Transparency zero. This is just one example of the lack of transparency in this budget.

Compare Yavapai College’s approach with how NAU addresses the subject of athletics in its budget. NAU has a full page in its budget devoted to athletics’. It separately lists the costs for each team it has, its coaches, its athletic operations cost and other athletics activities and then it goes deeper and breaks down for each team and other activity the various types of cost within that team etc. 

Before we go further let me explain one of the reasons why a detailed transparent budget matters.  When a Board and the public know how the college is spending its money then actions can be taken to eliminate expenditures that are extravagant or unnecessary. If that information is kept from a Board or the public then such misuses of money will go unknown and unchecked. People in our county have publicly spoken out about our high taxes and some have even come before the Board to do so.

I look at our Yavapai College tax rate versus Maricopa Country Community College’s tax rate and I am baffled. Our tax rate is 50% higher than Maricopa’s. That is a lot of difference. I also have looked at the total budget number of Coconino College versus Yavapai College’s total budget number. Comparing our most recent prepandemic student populations I find that Coconino have 58% of the student hours of Yavapai. One should then expect the Yavapai College budget to be about 42% higher than Coconino’s. But here is the shocker. Coconino’s prepandemic budget for this year was $27.5 million while Yavapai College’s was $84 million – more than three times as high! Why! Unless I can see a detailed transparent Yavapai College budget I will not know and neither will you.

A significant part of my job as a Board member is to protect the public of Yavapai County from over spending by the college that leads to over taxation. Unless and until I am given the opportunity to see a transparent Yavapai College budget I will not able to do that part of my job effectively.  My term is for another four plus years. I am not going away and I will continue to pursue this.

OPEN LETTER TO THE PUBLIC BY REPRESENTATIVE PAUL CHEVALIER URGING GREATER TRANSPARENCY OF COLLEGE BUDGET GENERATES FAMILY SPAT AMONG DISTRICT GOVERNING BORD MEMBERS

Caused Representative Sigafoos to state he would have sued Representative Chevalier for “defamation” except the law doesn’t allow it;  both sought the other to apologize;  Board in 4-1 vote adopts letter responding to Chevalier’s request for greater transparency

An open letter to the public in which Third District Representative Paul Chevalier expressed his view that the Community College budgeting process should be more transparent ruffled the feathers of some members of the District Governing Board.   The letter, a copy of which was published by this Blog July 21, 2020, caused  Governing Board  Chair, Deb McCasland to draft a response  that was adopted in a 4-1 vote.

Mr. Chevalier had attempted to share his views on the need for greater transparency in the budget process by reading his letter at   the July Governing Board meeting. He  was ruled out-of-order.  Following the meeting,  he released the  letter to the public in his individual capacity as a Third District elected represented.  It expressed his view that the Community College’s annual budget was not sufficiently transparent to adequately provide the public with information about the College.

During the discussion about the Board’s response to Mr. Chevalier’s letter at the September meeting, Representative Ray Sigafoos said that he was so affronted by the letter as a CPA, that “absent the Supreme Court in New York v. Sullivan, I might have a case to sue for defamation. But we’re all public officials here. I don’t have a case for defamation because I do not have proof, if you will, of actual malice. I have no proof of that but I think that in terms of those two paragraphs I cited, here in this screed, you owe this Board an apology.”  

Mr. Chevalier responded to Mr. Sigafoos comments and then asked Mr. Sigafoos to apologize  for his comments.  It is noted that during Mr. Sigafoos’ comments, Mr. Chevalier had wished Mr. Sigafoos a “happy birthday.” (It was Mr. Sigafoos birthday.) 

Representative Pat McCarver said she had never read Mr. Chevalier’s letter but voted in favor of the letter brought to the Board by the Chair anyway.  Ms. McCarver indicated  that she never has and never will read the Eyeonyavapai College Blog where Mr. Chevalier’s letter first appeared in July.

The back and forth between Board members and Mr. Chevalier about his open letter to the public took about 24 minutes.  You can view the entire discussion  on the video clip below.

The letter adopted 4-1 by the Board follows below as it appeared in the Agenda for the September 8 Governing Board meeting.  There were  no amendments to the letter during the meeting prior to the vote.

Item# 2.4

I am writing on behalf of the Yavapai College District Governing Board (DGB) and in response to the Eye on Yavapai posting entitled Third District Representative Paul Chevalier Wants Yavapai College to Produce a More Transparent Budget July 31, 2020. The DGB believes that the community deserves to have complete and accurate information about the College’s budget reporting processes, and as detailed below, we believe that the budget and the process by which it is prepared and approved is transparent.

Let me first address the preparation and approval of the budget. The budget preparation process starts in October each year and ends with the adoption of a budget in May, giving the DGB ample opportunities to ask detailed questions and the public ample opportunities to observe how the budget is prepared. In October, the process begins with a discussion and presentation from the College on revenue assumptions. In November, the College provides information from environmental scanning that may impact budget assumptions and decisions. The DGB holds a more in-depth budget workshop in January, and that is followed by a presentation and discussion regarding capital expenditures in March. After months of discussion and information sharing, the president presents a detailed preliminary budget in April, with opportunity for DGB and community input before the budget is approved in May.

This multiple month process provides the DGB with the information it needs to understand and develop an appropriate budget, and it provides the public with insight and understanding about all of the budget components. The DGB goes well above and beyond the legal requirements of public notification regarding the budget.

Now let me turn to the presentation of information in the College’s budget. The DGB is responsible for governing on behalf of and is accountable to the taxpayers of Yavapai County. As members, we fulfill this accountability by developing policies that govern the operations of the College. All operational decisions are delegated to the president of the College, and the president is then held accountable for the delegated areas through our structured and transparent monitoring process.

It is extremely important that we as DGB members respect and adhere to our delegated structure for a number of reasons, including to maintain good standing with our accreditation body. We also must respect the leadership of our president. We are very proud of what our president, Dr. Rhine, has accomplished in a very short period of time. She came in and listened to our students, staff, faculty, DGB and community. She has taken that information and made significant changes in both operational structure and fiscal management and reporting.

There is truly transparency in her approach and leadership style. Under Dr. Rhine’s leadership the institution has incorporated significant changes in the way the College’s budget is structured and reported. The report now includes budgetary data by department outlining every expenditure, including employee information by classification and information related to our auxiliaries, including the College’s performing arts center (PAC). In addition, the budget classifies expenditures according to the two sides of the county. We asked for these changes, and the president quickly delivered.

As a long term DGB member, I believe that the budget process and the budget reporting structure are thorough, detailed, transparent and effective. It is not about how many pages we have, it is about the consistent transparency, and I want to commend Dr. Rhine for her fiscal responsibility, leadership and business acumen.

 

 

 

 

NAU PRESIDENT RITA CHENG TO REPAY PART OF TRAVEL SPENDING CRITICIZED BY AUDIT

Will reimburse the Northern Arizona University Foundation for the difference between coach and business-class tickets involving trip to Russia

In a January 14 article by Rachel Leingang of the  Arizona Republic it was reported that Northern Arizona University President Rita Cheng will personally pay back some of the money highlighted by auditors involving a trip to Russia. 

Cheng told Ms. Leingang that the trip benefitted  the university in several ways. However, she said that she “felt like this needs to get behind us.  I need to take responsibility for the lack of documentation pertaining to the ticketing of my travel, and I’ll be repaying the foundation for the cost of difference between the business and coach travel.”

Source:  Article by Rachel Leingang, Arizona Republic, January 14, 2020. 

SEARCH COMMITTEE SET UP TO SELECT NEW MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CHANCELLOR

Seek an experienced and visionary leader

The Maricopa County Community College District has begun a search for a new chancellor after Maria Harper-Marinick resigned in September.  It has set up a search committee to help with the selection.  In a statement issued by the Board, it said it was “in the search for our next chancellor, we seek an experienced and visionary leader who will build upon our system’s past success and shepherd the colleges toward a future with an abundance of opportunities,”

The board has hired the  search firm Diversified Search to recruit for the position. It named 21 people to the search committee, which will  select candidates as finalists. The board will make the final hiring decision.

REPRESENTATIVE CHEVALIER CHALLENGES GOVERNING BOARD TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE ETHICAL ISSUE OVER ALLOCATION OF POWER AMONG BOARD MEMBERS WITH WEST HOLDING POWER FOR THE LAST DOZEN YEARS

“It’s a matter of ethics . . . and we should discuss it,” he said; but Board members refused to discuss the issue

Yavapai Community College District Governing Board member Paul Chevalier challenged the District Governing Board at its October meeting to openly discuss whether there had been discrimination in some form between the East and West regions of Yavapai County over the past several years.  He asserted that under the Governance model adopted by the Governing Board, the members were supposed to discuss disagreements. He argued in his contribution to the Governing Board September evaluation (see below) that the allocation of power among the Board members over the years raised a possible “ethical” issue for the Board and was in his view discriminatory.

Chevalier gave a specific example at the meeting in support of his claim. He said  that over the past twelve years no one from the east side of the County had been District Governing Board Chair, the most powerful position on the Board.  He argued that with the east side having 40% of the population, it should in theory have had someone as chair 40% of the time.

Despite his challenge to members to discuss the issue, the Governing Board remained silent.  No one would discuss whether his view was correct.  You may view his challenge to the Board in the very short video clip below. The issue was made at the October 8, 2019 Board meeting.

IF ELECTED AS SUPERVISOR, YC GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER IRWIN MUST LEAVE COLLEGE BOARD

Irwin currently  running for County Supervisor while sitting on YC Governing Board

A question was raised about whether current Yavapai Community College Board member Steve Irwin could simultaneously hold the positions of both a County Supervisor and a Yavapai Community College Board member. However,  It is clear that under current law he could not hold both positions. 

Under A.RS. § 15-1441(G), a county officer as provided in section ARS 11-401 is not eligible to serve as a member of a community college district governing board during his or her term of office. A.R.S. § 11-401(A) lists the county officers as follows:

  1. Sheriff.
  2. Recorder.
  3. Treasurer.
  4. School superintendent.
  5. County attorney.
  6. Assessor.
  7. Supervisors.
  8. Clerk of the board of supervisors.
  9.  Tax collector.

Source:  Yavapai County Education Superintendent.