Archive for Politics – Page 5

OPEN LETTER TO THE PUBLIC BY REPRESENTATIVE PAUL CHEVALIER URGING GREATER TRANSPARENCY OF COLLEGE BUDGET GENERATES FAMILY SPAT AMONG DISTRICT GOVERNING BORD MEMBERS

Caused Representative Sigafoos to state he would have sued Representative Chevalier for “defamation” except the law doesn’t allow it;  both sought the other to apologize;  Board in 4-1 vote adopts letter responding to Chevalier’s request for greater transparency

An open letter to the public in which Third District Representative Paul Chevalier expressed his view that the Community College budgeting process should be more transparent ruffled the feathers of some members of the District Governing Board.   The letter, a copy of which was published by this Blog July 21, 2020, caused  Governing Board  Chair, Deb McCasland to draft a response  that was adopted in a 4-1 vote.

Mr. Chevalier had attempted to share his views on the need for greater transparency in the budget process by reading his letter at   the July Governing Board meeting. He  was ruled out-of-order.  Following the meeting,  he released the  letter to the public in his individual capacity as a Third District elected represented.  It expressed his view that the Community College’s annual budget was not sufficiently transparent to adequately provide the public with information about the College.

During the discussion about the Board’s response to Mr. Chevalier’s letter at the September meeting, Representative Ray Sigafoos said that he was so affronted by the letter as a CPA, that “absent the Supreme Court in New York v. Sullivan, I might have a case to sue for defamation. But we’re all public officials here. I don’t have a case for defamation because I do not have proof, if you will, of actual malice. I have no proof of that but I think that in terms of those two paragraphs I cited, here in this screed, you owe this Board an apology.”  

Mr. Chevalier responded to Mr. Sigafoos comments and then asked Mr. Sigafoos to apologize  for his comments.  It is noted that during Mr. Sigafoos’ comments, Mr. Chevalier had wished Mr. Sigafoos a “happy birthday.” (It was Mr. Sigafoos birthday.) 

Representative Pat McCarver said she had never read Mr. Chevalier’s letter but voted in favor of the letter brought to the Board by the Chair anyway.  Ms. McCarver indicated  that she never has and never will read the Eyeonyavapai College Blog where Mr. Chevalier’s letter first appeared in July.

The back and forth between Board members and Mr. Chevalier about his open letter to the public took about 24 minutes.  You can view the entire discussion  on the video clip below.

The letter adopted 4-1 by the Board follows below as it appeared in the Agenda for the September 8 Governing Board meeting.  There were  no amendments to the letter during the meeting prior to the vote.

Item# 2.4

I am writing on behalf of the Yavapai College District Governing Board (DGB) and in response to the Eye on Yavapai posting entitled Third District Representative Paul Chevalier Wants Yavapai College to Produce a More Transparent Budget July 31, 2020. The DGB believes that the community deserves to have complete and accurate information about the College’s budget reporting processes, and as detailed below, we believe that the budget and the process by which it is prepared and approved is transparent.

Let me first address the preparation and approval of the budget. The budget preparation process starts in October each year and ends with the adoption of a budget in May, giving the DGB ample opportunities to ask detailed questions and the public ample opportunities to observe how the budget is prepared. In October, the process begins with a discussion and presentation from the College on revenue assumptions. In November, the College provides information from environmental scanning that may impact budget assumptions and decisions. The DGB holds a more in-depth budget workshop in January, and that is followed by a presentation and discussion regarding capital expenditures in March. After months of discussion and information sharing, the president presents a detailed preliminary budget in April, with opportunity for DGB and community input before the budget is approved in May.

This multiple month process provides the DGB with the information it needs to understand and develop an appropriate budget, and it provides the public with insight and understanding about all of the budget components. The DGB goes well above and beyond the legal requirements of public notification regarding the budget.

Now let me turn to the presentation of information in the College’s budget. The DGB is responsible for governing on behalf of and is accountable to the taxpayers of Yavapai County. As members, we fulfill this accountability by developing policies that govern the operations of the College. All operational decisions are delegated to the president of the College, and the president is then held accountable for the delegated areas through our structured and transparent monitoring process.

It is extremely important that we as DGB members respect and adhere to our delegated structure for a number of reasons, including to maintain good standing with our accreditation body. We also must respect the leadership of our president. We are very proud of what our president, Dr. Rhine, has accomplished in a very short period of time. She came in and listened to our students, staff, faculty, DGB and community. She has taken that information and made significant changes in both operational structure and fiscal management and reporting.

There is truly transparency in her approach and leadership style. Under Dr. Rhine’s leadership the institution has incorporated significant changes in the way the College’s budget is structured and reported. The report now includes budgetary data by department outlining every expenditure, including employee information by classification and information related to our auxiliaries, including the College’s performing arts center (PAC). In addition, the budget classifies expenditures according to the two sides of the county. We asked for these changes, and the president quickly delivered.

As a long term DGB member, I believe that the budget process and the budget reporting structure are thorough, detailed, transparent and effective. It is not about how many pages we have, it is about the consistent transparency, and I want to commend Dr. Rhine for her fiscal responsibility, leadership and business acumen.

 

 

 

 

NAU PRESIDENT RITA CHENG TO REPAY PART OF TRAVEL SPENDING CRITICIZED BY AUDIT

Will reimburse the Northern Arizona University Foundation for the difference between coach and business-class tickets involving trip to Russia

In a January 14 article by Rachel Leingang of the  Arizona Republic it was reported that Northern Arizona University President Rita Cheng will personally pay back some of the money highlighted by auditors involving a trip to Russia. 

Cheng told Ms. Leingang that the trip benefitted  the university in several ways. However, she said that she “felt like this needs to get behind us.  I need to take responsibility for the lack of documentation pertaining to the ticketing of my travel, and I’ll be repaying the foundation for the cost of difference between the business and coach travel.”

Source:  Article by Rachel Leingang, Arizona Republic, January 14, 2020. 

SEARCH COMMITTEE SET UP TO SELECT NEW MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGE CHANCELLOR

Seek an experienced and visionary leader

The Maricopa County Community College District has begun a search for a new chancellor after Maria Harper-Marinick resigned in September.  It has set up a search committee to help with the selection.  In a statement issued by the Board, it said it was “in the search for our next chancellor, we seek an experienced and visionary leader who will build upon our system’s past success and shepherd the colleges toward a future with an abundance of opportunities,”

The board has hired the  search firm Diversified Search to recruit for the position. It named 21 people to the search committee, which will  select candidates as finalists. The board will make the final hiring decision.

REPRESENTATIVE CHEVALIER CHALLENGES GOVERNING BOARD TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE ETHICAL ISSUE OVER ALLOCATION OF POWER AMONG BOARD MEMBERS WITH WEST HOLDING POWER FOR THE LAST DOZEN YEARS

“It’s a matter of ethics . . . and we should discuss it,” he said; but Board members refused to discuss the issue

Yavapai Community College District Governing Board member Paul Chevalier challenged the District Governing Board at its October meeting to openly discuss whether there had been discrimination in some form between the East and West regions of Yavapai County over the past several years.  He asserted that under the Governance model adopted by the Governing Board, the members were supposed to discuss disagreements. He argued in his contribution to the Governing Board September evaluation (see below) that the allocation of power among the Board members over the years raised a possible “ethical” issue for the Board and was in his view discriminatory.

Chevalier gave a specific example at the meeting in support of his claim. He said  that over the past twelve years no one from the east side of the County had been District Governing Board Chair, the most powerful position on the Board.  He argued that with the east side having 40% of the population, it should in theory have had someone as chair 40% of the time.

Despite his challenge to members to discuss the issue, the Governing Board remained silent.  No one would discuss whether his view was correct.  You may view his challenge to the Board in the very short video clip below. The issue was made at the October 8, 2019 Board meeting.

IF ELECTED AS SUPERVISOR, YC GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER IRWIN MUST LEAVE COLLEGE BOARD

Irwin currently  running for County Supervisor while sitting on YC Governing Board

A question was raised about whether current Yavapai Community College Board member Steve Irwin could simultaneously hold the positions of both a County Supervisor and a Yavapai Community College Board member. However,  It is clear that under current law he could not hold both positions. 

Under A.RS. § 15-1441(G), a county officer as provided in section ARS 11-401 is not eligible to serve as a member of a community college district governing board during his or her term of office. A.R.S. § 11-401(A) lists the county officers as follows:

  1. Sheriff.
  2. Recorder.
  3. Treasurer.
  4. School superintendent.
  5. County attorney.
  6. Assessor.
  7. Supervisors.
  8. Clerk of the board of supervisors.
  9.  Tax collector.

Source:  Yavapai County Education Superintendent.

MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CHANCELLOR TO LEAVE POSITION

Announces she will leave when her contract ends in May 2020

Maricopa County Community College District Chancellor Maria Harper-Marinick has announced that she will leave her position as the head of the  largest community college system in Arizona when her contract ends in May.

In a statement in which she announced her departure, she called the journey, “exhilarating, challenging, and at all times rewarding” because of the students and Maricopa employees “who are committed to ensuring that access to quality education and student success is a priority for our colleges.”

Harper-Marinick has worked for the Maricopa district for nearly 28 years and was appointed chancellor in 2016. The governing board in 2017 extended her contract through May 2020. 

Source:   AZCENTRAL Sept. 3, 2019

STEVE IRWIN LEAVING COMMUNITY COLLEGE GOVERNING BOARD AFTER ONE TERM

Has already launched campaign for Fifth District County Supervisor

Yavapai Community College Fifth District Board representative Steve Irwin will be leaving the Governing Board after one term.  He has announced that he is running for Yavapai County Board Supervisor for that District. He is already actively campaigning on Facebook (click here to see his Facebook page).  

The County Board consists of five members elected to four-year terms representing the five supervisor districts. The Board of Supervisors is responsible for the financing and administration of County government, has final approval over County department budgets, governs tax rates and calculates all other tax rates. The Board also has final approval for all zoning and use permits in the unincorporated areas of the County. The average Board of Supervisor salary is around $60,000 a year. There is no compensation associated with being a member of the Community College Governing Board.

Irwin was up for reelection as a member of the Yavapai Community College Governing Board in November 2020 after serving one six-year term.  His opponent for the Supervisor’s position in the 2020 election appears to be Mary Mallory. Mallory is a former Prescott Valley Council-member who was unanimously voted by the Yavapai County Board of Supervisors to fill the District Five Supervisor vacancy during a meeting on Monday morning, July 15, 2019. The Fifth District Supervisor’s seat was vacated by Jack Smith, who resigned from the position in late June following his appointment by President Donald Trump’s administration to serve as the Arizona State Director of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) – Rural Development.

The Fifth District encompasses the following portion of Yavapai County:    Castle, Diamond Valley, Glassford, Granville, Groom Creek, Horseshoe, Lynx Creek, Mountain View, Prescott Valley 1/Navajo, Prescott Valley 2, Pronghorn View, Roundup, Superstition, and Yavapai Hills.

DR. RHINE ANNOUNCES THAT VICE PRESIDENT OF STRATEGIC INITIATIVES WILL BE HIRED TO FOCUS ON IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY ADOPTING AN “OUTWARD MINDSET”

Says that there will be an organizational shift where innovation, accountability, collaboration, equity, transparency, and engagement will become the essence of the Community College’s normal culture

Community College President Dr. Lisa Rhine explained in a written message to the faculty that she is going to address the culture, health and strategic direction of the College in the coming months.  To help her accomplish those objectives, she is searching for a Vice President of Strategic Initiatives. This person will be responsible for improving and enhancing the online experience, improving enrollment management, expanding an Open Education Resources initiative, developing the learning core, and for leading the College’s Organizational Health strategies.

All of the message from Dr. Rhine to the faculty is included below.

“Yavapai College Family — over the past 90 days, I have met with many faculty and staff. I know I haven’t gotten a chance to speak to everyone yet, but I promise you I will soon. I also wanted to release this message before faculty left for break. It is clear to me that we need to address our culture, the health of our institution, and our strategic direction.

Healthy organizations have several similar characteristics including low turn-over, minimal politics, high productivity, high morale, and a structure that is conducive to high performance for faculty, staff, and students.

“That’s the kind of organization I want us to strive to become. Over the summer and together with our Executive Leadership Team, I need everyone’s help to putting us on that new path. A path where we all understand and believe in our purpose. We will establish a set of principles that will guide our behavior and decisions, making sure that the entire Yavapai College Family understands what we do and why we do it.

“We will do this by defining what I call, the “Yavapai College Way (YC WAY).” The overarching goal of the “YC Way” is to improve the health of our institution by adopting an outward mindset. This will be an organizational shift where innovation, accountability, collaboration, equity, transparency, and engagement will become the essence of our normal culture. Our inclusive approach will outline a new and intuitive way to teach our people how to implement mindset change in themselves and scale it across our institution with unprecedented results. “We will make changes in a way that ensures every action and effort throughout the institution directly or indirectly supports student learning and success. Read More→

NINE OF 10 COLLEGES IN MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT VOTE “NO CONFIDENCE” IN CHANCELLOR MARIA HARPER-MARINICK

Vote failed at Scottsdale Community College; Chancellor, Faculty to attempt to mediate dispute

Maricopa Community Colleges Chancellor Dr. Maria Harper-Marinick

Maricopa Community Colleges Chancellor Maria Harper-Marinick received a “no confidence” vote in her leadership from faculty representatives in nine of 10 colleges in the Maricopa County Community College District. The vote failed only at the Scottsdale Community College.

John Schampel, president of the Maricopa Community Colleges Faculty Association, wrote in an email that: “This vote, however unpleasant, has been necessary to preserve the values of teaching and learning that form the foundation for student success.”

The “no confidence” resolution began circulating to faculty leadership earlier this month, claiming the chancellor has failed to provide effective vision and oversight and accusing her of being “complicit” in governing board actions last year to limit faculty authority.

No-confidence votes don’t obligate the college’s Governing Board to take action. Their purpose is to send a message to the Governing Board that a group has lost confidence in the chancellor.

Some faculty criticized  the resolution claiming it failed to reflect the sentiments of all full-time faculty in the college district because it was cast by faculty senate representatives and not by the faculty at-large.

The dispute arose from the former Governing Board’s decision to abandon a “meet and confer” process that had been in place for 40 years. Faculty claimed it served as the cornerstone of “shared governance”. That is, it was a system of collaboration between the administration and faculty.  

A newly elected Governing Board reversed the action of the old Board.

An investigative report by the American Association of University Professors concluded as follows: “[T]he administration’s silence was deafening. As a result, this committee regards the MCCCD administration as entirely complicit…. Just prior to the vote on the [Governing Board] resolution [to abandon the “meet and confer” process] the Governing Board called upon Chancellor Harper-Marinick for comment. She replied that it would be inappropriate to comment on the resolution.” The AAUP report stated that, “in the view of this committee, that decision was a profound dereliction of her duty as chief administrative officer of an educational institution.”

You may read much more about the vote in a story posted on the web by reporter Anne Ryman, Arizona Republic, published April 18 by clicking here.

MARICOPA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR IN HOT WATER WITH FACULTY

Facing a possible no-confidence vote by the end of next week; big issue focuses on challenge to faculty authority 

Chancellor Maria Harper-Marinick

The Arizona Republic, in an article by  Anney Ryman published April 11, reports that the Maricopa Community Colleges Faculty Association is asking representatives at all 10 colleges to cast a “no-confidence” vote in the leadership of Chancellor Maria Harper-Marinick. The faculty leadership claims that  the chancellor has failed to provide effective vision and oversight and accuses her of being “complicit” in governing board actions last year to limit faculty authority. The leadership also claims that she failed to demonstrate leadership at “pivotal moments.”

The main issue appears to involve the authority of faculty to meet and confer about pay and benefits. The Maricopa Governing Board in February 2018 voted to end a long-standing process used to negotiate faculty pay and benefits called “meet and confer.” However, that decision was reversed when three new governing board members took office in January.

The Maricopa Colleges faculty association points to a report critical of the college district by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) that was released in March. The AAUP said it found evidence, obtained through public-records requests, that strongly suggested the Governing Board’s motivation for ending meet and confer was “union busting,” or mischaracterizing the faculty association as a collective-bargaining group and then attempting to destroy it.

The report was also critical of the chancellor, saying Harper-Marinick chose not to provide an opinion on the February board resolution that ended meet and confer. A AAUP committee that wrote the report said, “in the view of this committee, that decision was a profound dereliction of her duty.”

You may read the entire article by Anney Ryman in the Arizona Republic by clicking here.