Meeting private; no press or uninvited public allowed; Board members may attend; College will pick invitees from alumni and donors; others invited include Chamber of Commerce,  Mayors, Superintendents, City Managers 

Vice President of Community Relations, Rodney Jenkins, announced the scheduling of two alleged public forums to hear what the College described as “local feedback on the College’s performance and the role it can play in their communities going forward.” The College announced that the forums are private and neither the press nor the public can attend. Board members, however, can attend.

The College will decide who is invited and indicated its list includes certain members of the Chamber of Commerce, mayors, city managers, and superintendents. It will select certain alumni and donors. The individual views of the participants are to be kept anonymous from the public and contained in a report sent to the Governing Board. Board member Connie Harris described the event as “safe” with anonymous feedback.  Ironically, the Board and President Wills added that the event results should be “transparent.”

The west county forum will be held April 12, at the Prescott Campus Community Room, from 9 to 10:30 a.m. The east county forum will take place April 13, in the Verde Valley Campus Community Room, from 10 to 11:30 a.m.

The five questions participants will be asked to discuss follow.  Also, a short video of the College’s announcement made at the March 6 Governing Board meeting follows.

Here is the video.

McCasland consistently outvoted during workshop as she sought greater transparency and better understanding for citizens of the Governing Board process

The workshop held by the four Yavapai Community College Governing Board members on Monday, December 11 on the Prescott campus (Irwin was not present) was remarkable in the determination by President  Penelope Wills and Governing Board members Pat McCarver and Ray Sigafoos to keep Governing Board reporting standards as vague and abstract as possible. Deb McCasland fought a losing battle as she argued that the reporting provisions should be more transparent and provide greater detail so citizens and Board members could better understand and apply them.

The consultant hired by the Community College had rewritten many board policy statements associated with the goals that applied to President Wills. If adopted, the consultant’s suggestions would have provided greater clarity and understanding to Board members and the public. Consistently, McCarver, Sigafoos, and Wills vigorously opposed providing greater clarity. Third District representative Connie Harris joined with the West County representatives in opposing most of the clarifying statements. She showed little willingness to support McCasland’s effort to bring greater transparency and understanding to the Governing Board process.

The following is an example of a kind of clarity McCasland wanted. The suggestion came from the consultant and the discussion about it involved  the limitations on President Wills treatment of employees. The free speech provision read:

The statement was rejected as a provision to insert into the Governing Board governing process by Wills, McCarver, Sigafoos and Connie Harris. They claimed it was contained in summary fashion in a long, vague overarching statement made earlier during their discussion.

Exhibit by Nathaniel Foley on view until September 15

The Yavapai Community College Verde Valley Campus Art Gallery is  featuring an exhibit by Nathaniel Foley entitled, “flight of obscurity XII.” The Exhibit will be at the Art Galley until September 15.

The Community College describes the exhibit as sculptures “consisting of cones integrated with spires held together under tension, supported by utilitarian containers. This fragile relationship of forms exposes the delicate balance between grace and imminent danger, like the fleeting ballet of courting birds or hostile dogfight between foes. Referring to aeronautical form, the sculptures communicate tension and dance in direct opposition to fundamental forces.”

The Art Gallery is open from Tuesday through Friday from 10 AM to- 3 PM. It is closed Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. The Gallery is located at 601 Black Hills Dr. F-105, Clarkdale, Arizona 86324.

Verde Valley and Prescott politicians dual to persuade the State Junior College Board each side has the “best” location

The Blog has attached a short essay that portrays the early political struggle between the Prescott and Verde Valley politicians over the location of the first Community College in Yavapai County. This was the first of many political confrontations between the two sides of Mingus Mountain over Yavapai community College.

The dispute began in 1965. Both sides recognized the significant impact of locating a community college in their community in terms of its economic impact and overall impact on the residents. As with almost all political battles over the past 50 years involving Yavapai Community College, Prescott came out the big winner.

The essay below is in PDF format and may be downloaded by you if you choose to do so.

THE POLITICAL STRUGGLE OVER WHERE TO LOCATE THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

College says enrollment was too low to open any of the courses

Verde Valley Executive Dean James Perey reported that he has been forced to cancel all hospitality certificate courses offered at the Sedona Center prior to the start of the 2017 fall semester. His report came during an interview with Zachary Jernigan, whose article about the Center appears in the August 30 2017 edition of the Cottonwood Journal Extra.

Perry was quoted in the article as saying: “We need to regroup and evaluate what happened. … Look at our demographic and who to target.” Perry is also apparently considering partnering with Northern Arizona University’s hospitality program to align coursework at the Sedona Center with offerings at NAU.

Perry was also quoted in the article is saying that the College “can’t do this without business and industry … Partnerships” in the local community.

The Blog recommends a small blue-ribbon committee of Sedona business and political leaders be immediately assembled to help the College assess the reasons for the failure of this certificate program to obtain sufficient enrollment.

No formal explanation of absence from office March 21 to April 11

The cloak of secrecy around the whereabouts of Yavapai Community College President Penelope Wills from March 21 to April 11 is odd.  Staff, faculty and Board members either don’t know where she was or when asked refuse to disclose her whereabouts during that period or the purpose of her visit. 

Three sources have claimed to the Blog that she was in Auckland, New Zealand during a portion of that time. They also claim that Verde Campus Dean James Perey will visit New Zealand this summer–something about wine. 

It also seems odd that at neither the April nor May Governing Board meetings that Wills’ reported on the three-week absence from the District.  While her travel during the academic year is of little actual significance, the ability to cloak the travel and its purpose from the public illustrates the ease with which a bureaucrat paid about a quarter million dollars a year who runs a publicly financed entity can keep matters from the public.  The incident also illustrates the power Wills’ exercises over her subordinates to keep something as mundane as her travel from the public.   Obviously, this kind of behavior raises questions about what else is being kept from the public?

No benefits to enclosing Center area

The Governing Board was told November 1, 2016 that Sedona residents oppose spending $1.7 million to enclose the outside area of the Sedona Center.  The dispute over spending this amount of money is between the College staff that wants the space enclosed and the citizens who do not.

Citizens argued that the unnecessary expenditure and unnecessary enclosure will “irrevocably destroy the architecture of the building.” 

They also argued that for taxpayers of the County that the college is making an extremely poor financial decision. According to the taxpayers, enclosing the Center area increases by at least 40% the total cost of the culinary program. It does this without adding any programming or educational benefits to the students—young or old.

The video presentation made to the Governing Board on this issue can be viewed by clicking here.