Community College President avoids answering query about extending new program to the east side of the County
It’s really challenging to get much actual detailed information about Yavapai Community College’s future plans for the Sedona and the Verde Valley these days as Third District Yavapai College representative to the College Governing Board, Paul Chevalier, has found out. Chevalier, who consistently attempts to obtain details about College projects so he can report them to his constituents, has often run into a roadblock at Governing Board meetings when he sought this information.
Often, answers to his questions to a presenter are withheld or ruled out of order because of a present strict interpretation of a host of Governing Board rules plus what appears to be a general reluctance by the College President to share information with him. The saga of interfering with his questions about projects plus outright refusal to answer them continued unabated at the August 9 Special meeting called to discuss fees and tuition for the revived private pilot training program. (A special meeting video clip has been posted that you may view by clicking here.)
Third District Yavapai Community College representative Paul Chevalier
Chevalier, who from the sound of his voice over zoom appeared to become quite emotional, attempted to ask a handful of questions about the new private pilot program being initiated by the Community College. At times the interruptions and exchanges between the Governing Board lawyer, Board Chair, and Mr. Chevalier appeared to some listeners as painful.
The episode at the August 9 meeting is nothing new to those who have watched Mr. Chevalier battle to represent the interests of residents of Sedona and the Verde Valley. Most close observers of the Board meetings will agree that some members of the Governing Board have become increasingly hostile toward him, his questions, and his efforts to uncover information for his constituents about programs and projects in Sedona and the Verde Valley.
Chevalier first got into trouble at the August 9 Board meeting with Board Lawyer Lynne Adams. She found some of his questions about liability insurance as potentially hypothetical and inappropriate, although she did not rule them out of order. There was a big back-and-forth exchange over whether she was trying to muzzle him, which she denied.
He also got into trouble with Board Chair Deb McCasland who commented at one point that the only question before the Board was the tuition and fees to be charged, implying his questions did not focus on that issue. (As noted above, the presentation is posted to the Blog with these exchanges coming the last five minutes of the meeting.) Chevalier insisted that his questions were designed to help him decide the tuition and fees issue and whether they would adequately cover the costs associated with such an expensive program.
It was learned during Chevalier’s questioning of the administration’s presenter, Dean John Morgan, that the College will carry two million dollars liability insurance for the program. It was also learned that the instructors for the program will be part-time Community College employees and limited to 19 and three quarter hours per week. Thus, they will not necessarily enjoy benefits like those of full-time employees.
Most curious for some was the refusal near the end of the meeting to respond to Chevalier’s important question to Community College President Dr. Lisa Rhine about whether she would consider extending the Private pilot program to the east side of the District. The lease vendor selected by the Community College, Leighnor Aviation, operates airplanes out of the Cottonwood airport and out of Prescott. Chevalier noted that he had contacted Dr. Rhine about this well before the meeting so she would be prepared to answer it.
However, Dr. Rhine remained silent. Mr. Chevalier concluded from her silence that the answer must be “no.” The Board Chair stepped in and closed any discussion on the topic.
In the 4-1 vote approving the tuition and fees, Mr. Chevalier dissented stating the following:
“I believe that the college’s decision to not extend this program to Cottonwood is not well founded. Moreover, this decision creates another inequity against east side residents, particularly our east side veterans – who are people who put themselves on the line to protect our freedom. I was one of them, I was in harm’s way and I know first hand what many of our veteran’s did for us.
“I cannot in good conscience vote for this unnecessary and patently unfair inequity affecting our east side veterans and others. With grave disappoint at the college’s decision my vote is no.”
The presentation by the College and the above exchanges can be seen on the video posted by the Blog. You may view the presentation by clicking on the following link.